How to Approach Speaking and Listening through Drama
How
to Approach Speaking and Listening through Drama
(Siti Kholifatunnisa 171230077)
1. How
to Begin with Teacher in Role
Why use teacher in role?
One
of the best ways to do that in drama work is to be inside the drama. Therefore,
at the centre of the dramas that we include in this book, is the key teaching
technique that is used, namely teacher in role. Many times, we have watched
trainee teachers with a class of children struggling to get attention when
giving instructions in traditional teacher mode. Yet, as soon as they move into
role, they obtain that attention more effectively.
For
example, a trainee was talking out of role to a class to explain that they were
about to meet a girl who was having trouble with her father and needed their
help. She picked up a ribbon with a ring threaded on it and put it round her
neck as the role signifier. The trainee was not doing anything different apart
from using role and committing to it very strongly. The trainee was using the
simplest form of TiR, hot-seating the role, where the class meets the role
sitting in front of them and can ask questions.
You
are not effective as a teacher if you do not at some point engage fully with
the drama yourself by using TiR. Remaining as teacher, intervening as teacher,
side-coaching, structuring the drama from the outside, and/or sending the class
off in groups to create their own drama must at best restrict and at worst
negate any opportunity for the teacher to teach effectively. It is far more
effective for the teacher to engage with the drama form as artist and be part
of the creative act. It is very useful in a Literacy lesson for the teacher to
use roles from the text.
The
very fact that you take on a key role can provide important ways of defining
and exploring the text. Let us look more closely at the Hermia role. Here is
another way that the role could be introduced. This extreme social expectation
and law makes the fiction like their reality but also different from it,
something that helps drama create a useful distance, which helps the class
reflect on their own beliefs and look at the drama world in a more balanced and
thoughtful way.
Even
if the main aim of the work is not a study of the Shakespeare play, the role
can be used to open up very important areas for personal and social education
that the children can identify with.
Teacher as storyteller
The teacher as a storyteller is something all primary
school teachers will recognise. The teacher’s role will be to communicate the
text in a lively and interesting manner, holding their attention and engaging
their imagination. In making judgements about the quality of this method of
teaching, the critical questions will be around whether the content of the
story interests the class and holds their attention, whether the delivery of the
teacher. The connection between the teacher as storyteller and the teacher
using drama, lies in the fact that they both use the generation of imagined
realities in order to teach.
The relationship between story and drama in education
is a complex and dynamic one. It means a known narrative can still be used, the
knowledge of the narrative is not a barrier to its usage. However, if the
pupils are locked into the original narrative it is problematic. It is the
negotiable and dynamic elements of the relationship between drama and narrative
that liberate the pupils and the teacher from merely retelling the known story.
A
class can take part in a drama where all of them know the story, where none of
them knows the story, or a mixture of both. As long as some fundamental
planning strategies are observed, knowledge of the story is not a barrier to
participation.
a. A
willingness to move away from the fixed narrative to an exploration of the
narrative. The use of drama strategies to explore events and their consequences,
to look at alternatives and test them.
b. If
narrative consists of roles, fictional contexts, the use of symbols and events
then the teacher needs to hold some of those elements true and consistent with
the story so far. How the class respond to this event is not known and it is at
this point that they become the writers of the narrative. Let us illustrate
these ideas with an example from ‘The Pied Piper’ drama.
Prepare for the Role
This not only provides the teacher with
some security in knowing what is going to be asked, at least initially, but
also allows some minutes to refine the planning, so that the teacher can be
specific in answering their questions. The questions will, to a certain extent,
be predictable because they are largely generated by the circumstances of the
drama so far and the role the class has taken, which will be that of anxious
parents. You are going to be telling them a story, but it will be as if they
had just met you and it will not be the voice of the narrator re-telling
someone else’s story but in the present tense as if it is happening now.
Teaching from within
Moving in and out of role – managing the drama and reflecting on it
We are describing using role as ‘teaching
from within’ because the teacher enters the drama world, but it is very
important to step out of the fiction often and not let it run away with itself.
When using TiR, the teacher is operating as a manager as well as participant
and must spend as much time stopping the drama and moving out of role to
reflect on what is happening and give the pupils a chance to think through what
they know and what they want to do. This OoR working is as important as the
role itself. Let us look at an example to see how you as the teacher have the
opportunity to negotiate how the role behaves with the class.
This also shows a step from hot-seating to
role-playing as a demonstration with a small group. As with all of this section
of the book, we are using an example from drama based upon ‘The Pied Piper’ You
set up going into role with one of the groups that you know will handle the situation
well. There are too many of them for me as the town rat-catcher to catch.
The whole class is involved in defining
the role and can use their imaginations, their ‘drama eyes’, to help create the
appropriate appearance/behaviour and their own understanding. This is in
contrast to an actor who has to use acting skills to create the role in its
entirety for an audience. We are making a distinction between role behaviour
and acting. Both depend on appropriate signing, but whereas the actor must give
the non-participant audience the bulk of the signing, a teacher using role can
get away with a committed minimum.
The class will see the Rat-catcher as
overworked and probably needing help to put his/her case to the Mayor. When you
have discussed enough you can move back into role and take their stories about
the problems the rats are causing. You can do this with all of the class or
each family in turn. Give the groups time to prepare their evidence before you
go into role to receive the input.
The Rat-catcher ‘writes down’ the points
and then asks the class/family if they could come to the Mayor to help put the
case. The person playing the role can then simply walk forward adopting a
serious tone, holding the blanket, without having to pretend any of those
outward signs an actor would have to portray if it were a play being performed
to an audience. When the drama is stopped they can describe, recap, interpret,
think through, consider next moves and understand what the significance of
their work is. It is very important to get the participants to look at and
interpret what is going on, frequently by stepping out of the drama.
Depth in drama depends on the very clear
and regular use of OoR negotiation so that the awareness of the co-existence of
two worlds is effective at all times. Children commit to the fictional world of
the drama but need always to be aware that it is fiction and to step outside it
often to look at what they are doing. Contrary to some opinions, depth is not
dependent upon maintaining the fiction all of the time, nor does it depend upon
the children losing themselves in the drama. In fact, if the latter takes over,
children will get an experience but not understanding. In effective drama,
children can actually feel the ‘as if’ world as real at certain points. The
teacher must make sure that if the drama does engage in that way, the pupils
know it is a fiction at all times, especially by stopping and coming out of
role frequently.
The
requirements of working in role
This will help us shape up the TiR
elements particularly according to how the audience is seeing things. Here are
two responses to considering the ‘audience’ position. In drama the pupils are
making sense actively, knowing their meaning can be acted upon. They have to
switch from operating as audience to participant and back again often and
suddenly.
An example of responding to the critical
incident occurred in a session on the drama based on Macbeth. When considering
the way of showing the overthrow of Macbeth, one of the class of 10-year-olds
said, I want to sit on the throne and stop him sitting on it. The teacher took
this up and put two of the servants on the thrones of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth,
with the rest of the servants gathered behind the thrones. He then set up the
entry of Macbeth to the throne room.
TiR as Macbeth entered slowly and stopped
as though taking in the situation. Of course, the pupils sat firm and outfaced
him. He froze and one of the servants, picking up the idea of the situation, strode
up to Macbeth, ordered him to kneel and took the crown from Macbeth to
carefully and ceremoniously place it on the head of the usurping servant. The
class cheered as Macbeth bowed his head and the two pupils stood up,
triumphant. When they are given opportunities to influence the outcomes, to
make decisions, the drama becomes partly theirs.
Disturbing
the class productively
Discovery/uncovering –
challenge and focus
The teacher’s function is to provide
challenge and stimulus, to give problems and issues for the class to have to
deal with. The drama is developed through a set of activities that build the
class role, which is usually a corporate role. We have to help them into the
drama, making them comfortable, and then disturb that comfort productively. In
setting up the drama we are doing what Heathcote calls ‘trapping within a life
situation’
The key is how children are given
information. They can be handed it on a plate or they can be given
opportunities to uncover/discover/be surprised by information. In this last
case there is much more involvement and ownership, especially if they have to
work to get the information from someone who is reluctant to give it , someone
who only gives clues as to what is really going on , someone who does not
realise the importance of the information . Hence the skill of the teacher lies
in the art of the unexpected. An example of this occurs in ‘The Governor’s
Child’, a drama based on Brecht’s Caucasian Chalk Circle. The class are in role
as a village community helping a woman with a baby, who, unbeknownst to them,
has fled a revolution.
Responding
to your class
The art of authentic
dialogue – needing to listen – two-way responses
This community is made most effective by
the teacher participating in role. If a teacher runs drama without using TiR
there tends to be a lack of dialectic because the teacher produces the
structure that the children engage with, but the teacher can only manipulate it
from outside that structure.
The
teacher–taught relationship
In all teaching situations there exists a
power relationship between the learners and the teacher. Of course, it does not
look like this when the class are responding and contracting into the tasks set
by the teacher but should some or all decide not to, the cohesion can be
broken. In drama this power relationship is made overt. We must start from the
point of view that if the class do not want the drama to work then it will not.
The nature of drama makes the interest
level a dynamic and flexible dimension. The pupils will, to a certain extent,
define a level of interest in a drama by focusing upon the issues that interest
them. In the classroom, the pupils enter into an agreement with you the teacher
that you are in charge. This may be a tacit agreement, it may depend upon many
factors but in it the teacher is in charge and there are certain rights and privileges
attached to your role.
The power relationship is asymmetric. Of
course, in drama we have the possibility of shifting the power when we are
inside the fiction because we may choose a role that has low status and has
little power. It can result in a different kind of dialogue from the usual
teacher/pupil one and this can be very attractive to pupils. There are five
basic types of role and mostly can be illustrated from the ‘The Dream’ drama.
The
authority role This is a role like the Duke in the ‘The
Dream’ drama, who is presented with Egeus’s problem and has to rule on it. This
figure is usually in charge of an organisation and has the class in a role
subordinate to him/her. The role is fair, applies rules and governs properly,
but often does not know the full facts and issues and needs the class to
investigate and enlighten him/her. It is very close to being teacher and can be
reassuring for a class, but also has the negativity of not changing the
teacher–taught relationship enough to allow more ownership for the class.
The
opposer role This is a role that is often in authority
but dangerous to and/or creating a problem for another role and, by extension,
the class. Egeus is an opposer role who is against Hermia and therefore in
opposition to the class role, as they take her side against his dictatorial
treatment of her. The opposer role has to be used carefully because the
response to it can be difficult to handle if it becomes too strong. The
intermediate role This is often a messenger or go-between, as the servant role used
in the ‘The Dream’ drama. This role is then caught between opposing sides and
can appeal to the empathy in the class to help them out of the predicament. The
needing help role This is a role like Hermia, who is in need of help to fight
the injustice of her father’s decision. This role, like the servant described
above, is the best way to get empathy from a class and most raises the status
of the class, putting them in a position of responsibility and thus generating
interest and learning possibility because the teacher is the one who does not
know what to do for once. The ordinary person This role is in the same position
as the role given to the class. We do not have this sort of role in our ‘The
Dream’ drama but the Steward in the ‘Macbeth’ drama is like this. The three low
status roles present more possibilities for the pupils’ learning because the
teacher–pupil power relationship is shifted, and they have a semblance of
power. We say ‘semblance’ because the pupil power only lies within the fiction and,
as always, the teacher is running the class and can come out of role at any
time to assume control. Related to issues of power and role is the issue of
power and control in the classroom.
2. How
to Begin Planning Drama
The ingredients of planning
Let
us take the elements of a drama we have been referring to above and look at
them separately with other examples. Creating a drama is very much like
cooking. It is easy to serve up a fast food meal, which has very little quality
and goodness, but it is a more detailed, careful and thorough process to create
a quality meal from scratch with good ingredients. Our ingredients include the
following.
a.
Language Development
b.
Spiritual, Social, Moral, Cultural,
Personal
c.
Content the curriculum, focused on any
subject.
d.
Art Form drama – the more the class do
drama the more they understand the form and the more they can manipulate and
help shape the work.
e.
Thinking Skills – drama models the
mental moves that underpin our thought processes: actions and consequences,
being logical about decisions, giving reasons and arguing positions. The
very reflective nature of the work, going out of role to examine the meaning of
situations and events in the drama, promotes metacognition.
Planning as a
collaborative activity
We
also recommend that you plan with at least one other person. Planning for true
learning is a social activity and needs to have more than one mind brought in
to develop its full potential. In our team, one member may have the beginning
of an idea and sketch that idea out, but usually turns to another member of the
team for feedback and a planning discussion. This functions as a means to
bounce ideas, to see flaws and to provide insights into the potential for
learning. The complexity of drama means a multiplicity of possible learning
outcomes. For example, when planning developments to the original ‘Macbeth’
drama, we wanted to add the ‘Witch’ section. We began with the idea of facing
the class with the ambiguity and teasing language that the witches in the
original demonstrate. How to do this? One of us, A, had ideas about the Witch
arriving at the castle door, a vagrant, carrying something. This was developed
further by B with the suggestion that the bundle should contain a mirror. The
symbolism of this became obvious, considering some of the imagery in the play,
appearance and reality, what is truth? etc. When searching out a mirror, A came
across a cracked hand mirror and this was ideal. We can then use the mirror to
get the class to look into the future for Macbeth. Another example happened
with ‘The Wild Thing’. When sharing the planning so far with a group of trainee
teachers and looking at the composition of Max’s room, it was suggested that
Max would have a den, just like he’s making with a blanket hung over a rope in
one of the pictures in the story. This not only parallels the storybook but
also gives the teacher, as Max, a place to go and sulk when the class are trying
to get him to see sense and gives a place for the Wild Thing, who comes to find
Max, to hide and surprise the Lost & Found agents.
What about endings to
dramas?
The
most difficult thing can be resolving a drama satisfactorily in the time and to
the satisfaction of the class. This is to some extent in the planning but
mostly in the handling of the drama. They need to have solved the problem. If a
final resolution is possible, for example, as a result of the forum, Max
realises he must think of other people, then let them win, but the class must
have worked hard for it in putting the case across to him.
You, in role as Max, will feel the
pressure if they apply it well and can begin to signal that you do see you
might be wrong always to think of yourself, that you are listening for the
first time. We look to the class tackling the problem, the issue, the difficult
role, the wrong attitude. However, the ending is not always a happy ending
where all people become friends and the problem goes away. If the issue is not
easy to solve in reality, then pupils will see through it if you give them too
easy a change in the problem role and too soft a landing. Avoid that easy
ending. The three teachers who were observing one of us teach this drama had
discussed between the sessions what they thought the class would choose to do
in the second session.
3. How to Generate Quality Speaking and Listening
Authentic dialogue – teacher and pupil talk with a difference.
What is speaking and listening?
Speaking
and listening is the most important communication form that human beings use.
Really effective racy, developmental speaking and listening, will help pupils
build their language, their understanding, their ability to handle their own
world, making sense of it and who they are in it.
What does dialogic teaching demand of
the teacher?
One of the key changes that drama brings is a
different position for the teacher. If the teacher is the young boy, Daedalus,
who has taken his father’s secret project design, without his permission, and
the pupils are the family servants, then they have important decisions to make
about what they do with this knowledge. They will talk to Daedalus in a way
that they can never talk to a teacher. The teacher working through drama is
intervening as teacher but also as other roles within the drama, roles that are
models and anti-models to promote the pupils’ language in ways that teacher
language cannot.
They are framed within the drama context to oppose or
sort out this behaviour, all the more motivated by the fact it is their teacher
behaving in this way through the use of role. So, the teacher is able to talk
and interact with the pupils in many ways and with many purposes. The teacher
engages with the class and their contributions help build the fictional world.
The magical world of the fiction and the parallel real-world that we exist in
can help each other, so that the language the pupils use in the drama can be
looked at from the real world when we stop the drama.
This ‘metaxis’ makes the language possibilities far
richer than mere discussion can. When dropping out of role, the teacher
promotes a different form of language, reflecting on what has just happened,
examining it and defining what it means before planning what to do further. All
of this ensures that the pupils are thinking about what they are part of,
looking at actions and consequences and considering options, looking at what to
do and why. This reflective mode is special to drama. It would be odd to stop a
discussion and say, Let’s look at ourselves and what we said, how we were
standing, what it meant. In drama we do that routinely and the learning from
the elements of the drama becomes even more potent.
How
is listening of high quality taught through drama?
Drama is the creation of meanings in
action and pupils have to struggle all the time to make sense of what is going
on around them so that they can engage with it. Unless pupils listen, they do
not know what is going on. In drama we can get new levels of listening because
of the pupils’ interest in the problem-solving of the drama itself. The focus
of the problem or dilemma that the pupils face embodies the nature of the
language.
This is because each pupil has to make
sense of what the teacher and the rest of the pupils are gradually building up
around them. Pupils feel valued in drama and consequently have more confidence
in what they want to say and show more respect to what other contributors to
the drama say. In order for drama to work the teacher has to listen very
closely as well, to see where the pupils are, to pick up what the pupils are
offering and use it within the drama.
Lucy, one of the brightest members of the
class, who saw the implications of lying from the beginning, very shrewdly sees
how the teacher is making the pupils face the consequences of Icarus’s taking
of the folder. Centrally, the idea of actions and consequences is brought into
very sharp relief, the teacher and the class together exploring the
consequences of taking the folder in the first place. Lucy has taken the drama
on and helped the teacher explore this important area. The class have paid very
close attention, listening not only to the teacher but also their peers, their
representatives in the hot-seat.
Their feeling of involvement shows clearly
by the way they shriek when Daedalus talks of having to speak to the servants
about either the throwing away of the folder, or in version 2, their knowledge
of the plan. Obviously, the teacher stopped to talk this through with them
after Lucy’s final pronouncement but they did not need the implications
interpreting at the moment of revelation in the drama.
4. How
to Use Drama for Inclusion and Citizenship
What
can drama offer in terms of inclusion?
a. Drama
offers ‘new opportunities to pupils who may have experienced previous
difficulties’ (Ofsted, 2006, p. 7).
b. Drama
takes account of pupils’ varied life experiences and needs by using fictional
contexts and roles which enable pupils to explore the underlying issues safely.
c. For
some pupil’s drama may offer experiences that are different to those they
experience in the real world, for example taking the role of the outsider or
the role of the one in charge.
In drama we are
dealing with the ‘as if’ world. In this fictional world we can behave ‘as if’
events are taking place and ‘as if’ we are there.
The
relationship between inclusion and citizenship
If drama by its very operational values is
an inclusive way of working and if the contents of some dramas are in
themselves examining the nature of the outsider, then Citizenship and PSHE are
an integral part of the drama experience. The QCA booklet on Citizenship for the
primary age groups defines the area as follows: The PSHE and Citizenship framework comprises four interrelated
strands which support children’s personal and social development. The strands
are:
a.
Developing confidence and
responsibility and making the most of their abilities;
b.
Preparing to play an active role as
citizens;
c.
Developing a healthy, safer
lifestyle; and
d.
Developing good relationships and
respecting the differences between people.
How to approach
Citizenship and PSHE through drama: practising being part of a society
They can make trips out or relevant
visitors can be brought in to make pupils aware of the important structures and
ideas that community involves. Indeed, if children get very committed to a
real-world project there is a dilemma for the school. Drama’s relationship to
citizenship works on two levels, as a methodology that demonstrates aspects of
citizenship in action and when the content is specifically focused upon issues
of citizenship. When we consider that drama can link citizenship with personal
and social education, and spiritual, moral, social and cultural education, then
we can begin to understand the importance of drama as a teaching method.
5. How
to Generate Empathy in a Drama
What is empathy?
In
this chapter we would like to examine the relationship between drama in
education and the concept of empathy. Drama is often promoted as a teaching and
learning methodology that generates empathy in pupils, yet there is little
debate about exactly what is meant by this idea. The word empathy is sprinkled
liberally throughout education documentation and literature. For example, the
Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL) documents that are, at the time
of writing, being trialled in the UK make reference to empathy (SEAL, 2006).
A working definition of empathy
We
need a definition that not only belongs to the real world but can be replicated
inside the drama lesson. Pupils will then be able to empathise without having
to bear witness to or have the actual life experiences of those to whom they
are directing their empathy. In this way we protect pupils from actual real-life
experiences and yet generate the opportunity to empathise with those caught up
in these experiences.
The components of empathy
The
idea of a ‘cognitive’ stage and an ‘affective’ stage in the empathetic process
is taken from the writings of Alan Leslie in his work at London University, as
summarised by Simon Baron-Cohen. Component Two – the affective component ‘The
second element to empathy is the affective component. This is an observer’s
appropriate emotional response to another person’s emotional state’. Having
recognised the emotional state of the person, the observer is moved to
‘alleviate their distress’.
There
is here a desire to do something, to take action, and therefore empathy is not
just about recognising the emotional state of someone but also doing something
about it.
An example of structuring drama for
empathetic response
Let
us use these ideas to analyse how empathy might be generated using as an
example ‘The Workhouse’ drama.
6. How
to Link History and Drama
Balancing the tensions – stories and
history
Much
of drama in education operates from creating fictions and telling stories. Of
course, this is not necessarily in conflict with history as we can approach
individuals’ viewpoints in history as their stories of the past. We need to be
clear about our learning objectives, about what we are trying to teach. We are
going to use a drama about Victorian street children to illustrate how drama
and history can be structured to work in harmony.
In
using drama, we are using a dense form of teaching, because the currency of
drama is language, listening and speaking, and we have a cross-curricular
approach that will touch upon learning objectives from several areas of the
curriculum. Let’s begin with the English and the History National Curriculum
learning objectives.
7. How
to Begin Using Assessment of Speaking and Listening (and Other English Skills)
through Drama
What is assessment?
The
primary aim of assessment is to provide information about the development and
achievement of those involved in the teaching and learning situation.
Assessment records evidence related to students' abilities, both actual and
potential, and charts their progression. The intended audience of assessment
feedback should always include the students themselves. (Clark and Goode, 1999,
p. 15)
What is the purpose of the
assessment?
To:
a.
Give feedback to the pupil
b.
Report to another teacher
c.
Report to a parent
As
we have indicated, the first is vital. Pupils need to know what they are doing,
how they can improve and to be encouraged in speaking and listening, after all
it is the primary communication skill.
Formative assessment – honouring what
children can do
Since
the inception of the National Curriculum, assessment of Speaking and Listening
has been formative and informal. We would not change that approach. Our
approach is not to produce league tables, but to give a snapshot of pupils’
communication skills in order to recognise achievement and to chart possible
development. The prime requirement on teachers when doing assessments is to
listen to the pupils and to look carefully at the activity. In the formative
role of assessment, we need to be feeding back to the pupils during and after
the drama. We might stop a drama and say to everyone; can you see what Anisa’s
question made the Soldier say? That is very important here. Let’s see what the
outcome is. Then we are building esteem and boosting achievement.

Komentar